If George W. Bush had been president in 1941,

Bush/Views; "If George W. Bush had been president on Dec. 7, 1941, he would have declared war on a country like Spain rather than on Germany and Japan. Despite the fact that it was Japan which had attacked the U.S., Bush would have argued that Spain was the real threat to world security.Bush would have noted that Spain possessed "weapons of mass destruction" and that the Spanish government had tortured, murdered and bombed its citizens. An attack on Spain would have distracted the voters from the damage Bush's policies were doing to the country while showing that he was taking forceful, action against a rogue state. The fact that Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy and Imperialist Japan were left free to wage war on the rest of the world would have been ignored, thanks to a barrage of publicity about how Bush was a strong, forceful leader who was smoking the terrorists out of their holes in Spain. If you think this is an absurd analogy consider this: It was Saudi Arabia and Pakistan that financed and supported Osama bin Laden, and it was Saudi Arabia which provided 15 of the 19 hijackers, yet Bush has not dealt with those sponsors of terrorism. But then, Bush's father and Dick Cheney have benefited financially from Saudi Arabia, so one must not kill the goose that lays the golden eggs. If you still think the analogy with Spain is absurd, consider this: Bush's grandfather, Prescott Bush, sold war bonds for Hitler, so why would a Bush declare war on Hitler?....(Note): The information on Prescott Bush's dealings with the Nazis was taken from the Introduction (written by Toby Rogers and Nick Mamatas) to the book, "Fortunate Son, George W. Bush and the Making of an American President" by J. H. Hatfield."

Yes I know more slam on the good ole boy Mr. Bush!! Just can't help myself their so funny and do make you think because their is some truth in them...Sure their is read it again!!